English translation
Alexandre del Valle wanted to take stock of the American election and the extreme polarization of American society, exacerbated since the Black Live Matter by interviewing the Grand Reporter, writer and documentary maker Pierre Rehov, specialist of the United States. The latter asserts that the charge of Democrats' electoral fraud brought by Donald Trump and the Republicans is undeniable, and that if the Democrats lose the election after an invalidation by the Supreme Court or if they manage to "steal" it, he hypothesis of a civil war can no longer be ruled out ...
>Alexandre Del Valle. As the media announces the victory of Joe Biden, you seem, by your interventions on social networks, television stations and certain Internet sites to feel that nothing is lost for Trump. Why ?
Pierre Rehov. For a very simple reason. It is not for the Associated Press or CNN, both of which are Democratic Party supporters, to decide the outcome of an election. Despite the attempts by these influence groups - who masquerade as news reporters - to sneakily intervene against a hated President, the United States remains a democracy and a country of law. Until the vote count is complete and the opposing side concedes the election, neither candidate can claim it. On November 4, the numbers were so much in favor of President Trump that in his enthusiasm he said he was elected. Immediately the media and social networks censored him. This time it's up to Biden to make a similar statement and all the media are ecstatic. In the end, it is the federal administration that appoints the next president on December 12, after the vote of the Grand Voters and the exhaustion of all remedies. And as you know, there are many remedies. We are in a situation similar to that of 2000, when George W Bush announced his victory, picked up by the media and congratulated by several politicians, only to learn the next day that Al Gore was calling for a recount in Florida. In the end, the Supreme Court had to decide.
>How do you explain Trump's success in areas known for their strong "Latin" presence like Florida and even among a growing portion of the black American population?
A Pew Survey found that 33% of black and Latino Americans are much more optimistic about their future since President Trump's election. Although the number seems small, it is more than double that obtained during the Obama administration. Oddly enough, this surge of optimism or, rather, appreciation of the Trump administration's policy towards them, was especially confirmed after the riots supported by the Democrats around the overdose death of George Floyd, including policeman Chauvin was charged. It goes without saying that the behavior of this policeman, known for his violence and unfairness, remains more than reprehensible, but he did not intend to kill Floyd, especially in front of cameras, and the autopsy revealed that the The former convict had taken a lethal dose of Fentanyl several times. These riots sparked the birth of a movement to disarm and suppress some US police budgets. However, Black and Latino communities are the most affected by rural violence. We must not forget that 90% of blacks murdered in the United States are the victims of other blacks. Contrary to the current fashion promoted by the left-wing media, American police officers are, on the whole, all the less racist in that they have in their ranks a number of blacks and Latinos far greater than their percentage in the population. For these fragile populations, the disarmament of the police is something of concern and one of President Trump's slogans "Law and Order" has struck a chord. But it's not just that, of course. The deregulations led by Trump - who perfectly understood a simple equation: less state intervention in the world of work, associated with less taxes for companies, leads to less unemployment - have revived a rather ailing economy under the various Democratic administrations, and revived employment in all societal sectors, including and especially among black and Hispanic populations. I'll give you some figures, because they don't lie: in January 2020, before the Chinese virus crisis, unemployment among the Black population was 6.8%, i.e. the lowest since 1972, and 2 points below the best numbers under Obama. Beyond ideology, people ultimately vote for what they see on their plate and based on their sense of security.
>Do you believe, like some alarmists, that there is a risk of civil war? Is this a scenario resulting from the current elections?
I am, like many, and receiving a lot of supporting evidence, convinced that the Democrats, as of this writing, are trying to steal the election through organized fraud on a scale. national. When I say this, I am often told that the examples of “so-called” fraud revealed are too big and that, if the Democrats had been smart enough to carry out such a criminal operation, they would not have been caught so often. hand in the bag. Imagine, on election night, President Trump was leading in enough states to be ready to announce victory. And suddenly, around 4 a.m., counting centers shut down for no reason and votes by the hundreds of thousands appear in favor of Biden, with no further votes for any other candidate. In some states, like Arizona, tens of centenarians, including a lady born in the 19th century, suddenly voted for Joe Biden. Postal voting, regardless of the media vested in Democrats and social networks who take advantage of their special status to censor an elected president and his supporters at will, is truly the door open to all fraud. Mail bags were found thrown in recycling centers. The rate of voting in some states is as high as 110% of the number of registered voters. Never seen. In the USA, you have to show your ID to buy a pack of beers, but in many places, not to vote! Employees at counting centers were caught on camera creating fake ballots. Most importantly, for obvious reasons, Democratic "observers" prevented Republican observers from entering many sorting centers. There are videos, testimonials. So how could a political party have gotten caught out so often if it had the power to organize fraud on such a scale? The answer is quite simple.
The Democratic bundle, while it has plagued much of American administration and society, is not an army of trained mercenaries. These are common people who participated, spontaneously or by remote control, in this organized crime. They often felt all-powerful, since they were supported by almost all of the media and inevitably made mistakes.
We are therefore in a situation where half of the United States of America feels that they have been cheated, of having had their right to vote stolen, by a party that offers them the worst programs for an American. . Biden pledged to raise taxes ... great electoral argument, right? He also promised to legalize 11 million illegal immigrants, to revert to the deal with Iran that would allow the land of the Mullahs to rake in billions, as under Obama, and to use it to finance and boost numbers. terrorist organizations similar to Hezbollah and Hamas before obtaining the atomic bomb in less than ten years. He wants to eliminate or reduce the extraction of oil by fracking, which will lead to the disappearance of thousands of jobs and of American energy independence. Etc ..
What American supposed to vote for such a death sentence for his country? Not to mention the fact that Biden is accused of rape by his former assistant - but there, no one is "me too", that he has a documented attraction to little girls, that he does not know where he is or What election he is running for and has campaigned from the basement of one of the tens of millions of dollars mansions he would have acquired with his salary as a senator. The FBI began an investigation from the computer of his drugged son Hunter, which was left behind in a repair shop and the contents of which clearly demonstrate that the Biden sold their influence to dictatorships and totally corrupt companies. But which media has made its headlines about this affair that makes Watergate seem like a kindergarten argument? Today, the American people are divided in distressing proportions, and the four years of the Trump presidency have heightened political passions while the Democrats have continued to add fuel to the fire.
All this to explain that, on the one hand, the Democrats, while scheming at a level which far exceeds the limits of indecency, have created, with BLM and Antifa, a Frankenstein monster which risks escaping them, and , on the other hand, the part of the American people who support President Trump are fed up and ready to fight for their rights. I take it that if President Trump demonstrates fraud and stays in power, the Democrats will arrange for violence to explode and if the Democrats manage to steal the election there may be bloodshed. Yes, I unfortunately believe in the hypothesis of a civil war.
>ADV: How do you respond to the accusation by Democrats and much of the European press that Trump is close to the white supremacist far right and even the KKK?
P.R: This accusation is so absurd that it has to be put in the same closet as the one making the President an "anti-Semite". An "anti-Semite" whose favorite daughter converted to Judaism with his blessing, whose lawyers are almost entirely Jewish, whose son-in-law wears the kippah, whose small children celebrate Hanukkah, and who recognized Jerusalem as the capital of the Jewish state! We took a sentence of Trump out of context to accuse him of supporting white supremacists and the KKK, so I'm going to put his intervention in context, while specifying that he has publicly condemned 17 times (I have the videos ) these organizations. According to the media, during the riots in Charlottesville in 2017, during which leftist provocations led to violence that benefited far-right movements, Trump would have said that there were good people among the neo-Nazis and white supremacists. His exact line is: “You had people - and I'm not talking about neo-Nazis and white nationalists - because they should be totally doomed. But you had a lot of other people in that group besides the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists who were good people. There were both sides. In saying this, the President was trying to condemn both right-wing extremists and left-wing extremists who attempted to destroy the Statue of General Lee. The funniest thing about the affair, and which many have forgotten, is that the Democratic Party fought against Lincoln in the Civil War, and supported slavery, in the same way they subsequently opposed the women's vote and lobbied President Roosevelt to prevent him from opening US borders to Jews trying to escape Nazi Germany. The Democrats put on a lambskin between the wars to escape the disastrous image of the misogynist slavers they portrayed but above all to oppose the conservative approaches of the Republican Party. As they are proving, the background has not changed.
>ADV: Can we still speak of a democracy faithful to the principles of John Locke (checks and balancies) in the United States when we see that 90 percent of the press and intellectual circles and showbiz use all their weight to demonize President Trump and its supporters, which necessarily distorts the electoral results?
P.R: In the past, there were three powers if we put aside that of the Church: the legislature, the executive and the media supposed to inform the public. Sadly, so many journalism professors have moved to the left in a country where the New York Times, the most leftist of dailies, is considered the news bible, that journalism has no longer become a news profession but rather the world of disinformation, opinions and propaganda. Imagine that one of President Trump's sons was caught with his hand in the bag, thanks to the hard drive of a forgotten computer because he was probably too "high" to remember, and the evidence has accumulated of collusion between his family and Chinese dictators, associated with transfers of millions of dollars, or that porn videos and photos have appeared, showing him with young girls, the majority of whom are far from proven, and innuendo on his father's pedophile inclinations. It would have made the headlines of the New York Times of the Washington Post and at least 90% of the media, the best hours of CNN and MSNBC, while Twitter and Facebook would have kindly let through what, until judgment, remains. as allegations under US law, despite the visual evidence. But when it comes to Hunter Biden, the $ 50,000 monthly salary he got from Burisma after asking his father to step in to fire the prosecutor who was dealing too closely with the level of corruption in the Ukrainian company in question, when the same Joe Biden, who is not a blunder, proudly declares to the Council of Foreign Relations in January 2018 that he "intervened with the Ukrainian president and told him that he would only have the billion dollars in American aid after having fired p's son. (Biden's speech easily found on the net), it is not only radio silence, but Twitter and Facebook have even gone so far as to censor and restrict the New York Post account which had committed a crime of lese majesté by exposing the level of corruption in the Biden family. Far from doing its job of observer and informant, the American media world, like almost everywhere in the world, has bombarded itself with political interveners for the benefit of the left. Add to that all of Hollywood and Wall Street whose stakeholders have a vested interest in ensuring that the swamp created by the Democrats continues to benefit them, and you have a picture that brings us closer to the terrifying world imagined by Orwell in 1984. There is that to replace the term "Big Brother" by "Democratic Party" This is how dictatorships are born and are reinforced.
>ADV: What scenarios do you envision by next January? Some say the Supreme Court could overturn the results not of three states accused of fraud, but only one.
P.R: I am not a diviner, nor claim to be, but based on current facts, which are constantly changing, I remain somewhat optimistic about President Trump's possibility of retaining the presidency. The odds are held. In my opinion, the events are likely to unfold as follows. At first, Biden will be declared the winner of the presidential race. President Donald Trump will win legal battles in some states, will lose elsewhere (depending on whether the judges are Democrats or Republicans, and whether the evidence his teams can gather will be solid or not). He will then take his challenge to the Supreme Court. If Republicans have taken the necessary precautions to trap fraudsters and if Trump's lawyers do their job, massive amounts of illegitimate votes will be exposed. Trump will ultimately win his case and be declared president. Riots like we've never seen will break out. It is not excluded that President Trump will declare a state of emergency and call in the National Guard to restore order, before tackling the swamp. He will have four more years to do so. But this is all just a guess and my predictions are bound to change as new events arrive. The soap opera is not over.
(post is archived)