Monarchie sociale | Les Amis de la Nation Française

(post is archived)

[–] • 0 pt

Neither egalitarianism, nor conservatism, nor spoliation

The pension reform envisaged by Macron and his government combines the three flaws of the French republic: an egalitarian rage, which involves the immediate or deferred spoliation of certain French people, combined with destructive immobility.

With his pension reform project, Emmanuel Macron succeeded in demonstrating that he was only looking for political and financial solutions to a human problem.

The grotesque comedy of this reform announced, discussed, rediscussed, overhauled, still discussed is the painful proof of the impossibility of achieving the common good in a partisan regime, where the party in power has as roadmap only its re-election and as the only compass the consensus of the legal elites.

And first of all, why would you want to align all pension plans? Why could members of a given profession not organize themselves according to the interests specific to this profession, especially if they are in control of the funding of their specific plans? We do not see that equity is harmed or that public finances are harmed.

But on the other hand, why sanction, for identical trades which differ only by the employer, public or private, a difference in treatment which benefits state agents more than largely? There, for once, equity is threatened.

The so-called welfare state has in fact adopted a single rule: to safeguard the state apparatus and to ransom the French, "systemically" and "parametrically", while forbidding them to build up safe savings.

The republic, once again, aims only at total control, for the benefit of a plutocratic class, of an impoverished population reduced to a legal charity entirely dependent on the goodwill of the power in place.

Beyond the question of pensions, special schemes, the grandfather and the alleged sacred nature of acquired advantages which only benefit the clienteles of fossil unions, what this reform brings to light is the hostile nature of the republican government which unceasingly opens new fronts against all the uses, all the professions, all the intermediate bodies; against all the French. And who only seeks to retain power and the class that unduly occupies it.

These are all struggles that must converge, at every opportunity.

French action calls on all citizens, all taxpayers, the whole real country, to protest against the legal country and its clique of technocrats at the behest of financiers.

French action (5/12/2019)

**Neither egalitarianism, nor conservatism, nor spoliation** The pension reform envisaged by Macron and his government combines the three flaws of the French republic: an egalitarian rage, which involves the immediate or deferred spoliation of certain French people, combined with destructive immobility. With his pension reform project, Emmanuel Macron succeeded in demonstrating that he was only looking for political and financial solutions to a human problem. The grotesque comedy of this reform announced, discussed, rediscussed, overhauled, still discussed is the painful proof of the impossibility of achieving the common good in a partisan regime, where the party in power has as roadmap only its re-election and as the only compass the consensus of the legal elites. And first of all, why would you want to align all pension plans? Why could members of a given profession not organize themselves according to the interests specific to this profession, especially if they are in control of the funding of their specific plans? We do not see that equity is harmed or that public finances are harmed. But on the other hand, why sanction, for identical trades which differ only by the employer, public or private, a difference in treatment which benefits state agents more than largely? There, for once, equity is threatened. The so-called welfare state has in fact adopted a single rule: to safeguard the state apparatus and to ransom the French, "systemically" and "parametrically", while forbidding them to build up safe savings. The republic, once again, aims only at total control, for the benefit of a plutocratic class, of an impoverished population reduced to a legal charity entirely dependent on the goodwill of the power in place. Beyond the question of pensions, special schemes, the grandfather and the alleged sacred nature of acquired advantages which only benefit the clienteles of fossil unions, what this reform brings to light is the hostile nature of the republican government which unceasingly opens new fronts against all the uses, all the professions, all the intermediate bodies; against all the French. And who only seeks to retain power and the class that unduly occupies it. These are all struggles that must converge, at every opportunity. French action calls on all citizens, all taxpayers, the whole real country, to protest against the legal country and its clique of technocrats at the behest of financiers. **French action** (5/12/2019)

link