Well my point was that they dont even *need* to vote it out. That legislation i talked about *must be voted out* for it to be removed as a law. A parliamentary law debated and voted on by a *full bipartisan parliamentary session* cannot by any stretch of the imagination be overridden by *a single persons mandate* No different from me say, winning a billion dollar powerball, spending money on a campaign to get elected, then when i get elected saying 'I declare that anyone who does not have red hair needs to be quarantined and dealt with' our law specifically says 'victorians have the right to leave, return, travel and live wherever they like in the state' 'victorians have the right to peaceful public assembly' 'victorians have the right to choose and refuse medical treatments' *one mans mandate* cannot possibly say 'nah not today'. Any member of parliament *voting for an extension on an illegal mandate is not legalising the mandate, they are committing conspiracy to commit treason, as are any judges ruling on the side of that illegal mandate. The moment the police started enforcing the mandates, they became a criminal organisation. The moment judges began siding with the police and convicting people for breaching the mandates they became a criminal organisation. Both of those groups, by the nature of their work, do not have plausible deniability. Their job was literally to say no and arrest the politicians and judges attempting to enter mandates. Not that they were ever going to do that, given that all three groups have the same Masonic/Satanic masters. *We* are 'the sovereign' in this country, not parliament. and no, that has literally nothing to do with 'sovereign citizens' we are quite literally the legal sovereigns in this country and have been since since the legislation of the Australia Act 1986 which removed the right of anyone to override the High Court of Australia by appealing to the Privy Council in the UK. If her maj isnt the sovereign and our country is a democracy we are the sovereign.