Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

In a statement earlier this week, the DOJ said it was sending officials to 64 jurisdictions throughout the country - most of which would be in red or purple states.

Included in the list was Broward County, Miami-Dade County, and Palm Beach County.

Brad McVay, General Counsel at the Florida Department of State, responded...

"(T)he Florida Department of State received copies of your letters to Miami-Dade and Broward Counties in which you seem to indicate that the Department of Justice will send monitors inside polling places in these counties," reads a letter to the DOJ from McVay.

"We also understand you sent a similar letter to Palm Beach County."

"But Department of Justice monitors are not permitted inside a polling place under Florida law," McVay continues.

"Section 102.031(3)(a) of the Florida Statutes lists the people who ‘may enter any polling room or polling place.’ Department of Justice personnel are not included on the list. Even if they could qualify as ‘law enforcement’ under section 102.031(3)(a)6. of the Florida Statutes, absent some evidence concerning the need for federal intrusion, or some federal statute that preempts Florida law, the presence of federal law enforcement inside polling places would be counterproductive and could potentially undermine confidence in the election."

In short, pound sand.

In a statement earlier this week, the DOJ said it was sending officials to 64 jurisdictions throughout the country - most of which would be in red or purple states. Included in the list was Broward County, Miami-Dade County, and Palm Beach County. Brad McVay, General Counsel at the Florida Department of State, responded... "(T)he Florida Department of State received copies of your letters to Miami-Dade and Broward Counties in which you seem to indicate that the Department of Justice will send monitors inside polling places in these counties," reads a letter to the DOJ from McVay. "We also understand you sent a similar letter to Palm Beach County." "But Department of Justice monitors are not permitted inside a polling place under Florida law," McVay continues. "Section 102.031(3)(a) of the Florida Statutes lists the people who ‘may enter any polling room or polling place.’ Department of Justice personnel are not included on the list. Even if they could qualify as ‘law enforcement’ under section 102.031(3)(a)6. of the Florida Statutes, absent some evidence concerning the need for federal intrusion, or some federal statute that preempts Florida law, the presence of federal law enforcement inside polling places would be counterproductive and could potentially undermine confidence in the election." In short, pound sand.

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

He will lose this type of argument due to the supremacy clause of the US Constitution. Does the sovereignty of the states trump the Executive Branch's cabinet functions? Likely not and this has been tested multiple times in the courts.

[–] • 1 pt

>Does the sovereignty of the states trump the Executive Branch's cabinet functions?

What is unclear is why they are coming to florida, I mean administratively speaking they have no specific reason, kind of as if they were cops and had no search warrant, cops on a fishing trip

At least that's how I understand the situation, on what he relies to block them

[–] • 0 pt

It was a very predictable landslide win for DeSantis. Unsure why they needed to go there, as well.

[–] • 0 pt
[–] • 0 pt

Name one time thats been "tested"

[–] • 0 pt

https://www.oyez.org/issues/325

Even better: you name a single one that showed the states Trumped the US DoJ in enforcement power.

[–] • 0 pt

works backwards in nullification.

Eg, Texas passes right to try laws then Congress follows

Colorado legalizes marijuana

California criminalizes NDAA and indefinite detention.

Missouri: "the right of every citizen to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person, family and property, or when lawfully summoned in aid of the civil power, shall not be questioned. The rights guaranteed by this section shall be unalienable. The state of Missouri shall be obligated to uphold these rights and shall under no circumstances decline to protect against their infringement."

Etc

Nullifications now unchallenge in the legal system because they're already lost.. feds have no say over state law..