>Some parents and students have previously complained that the district’s dress code is sexist, noting that more than 80% of infractions over the last three years have been issued to female students and that a photo of male students in swim briefs by a pool made it into the yearbook without editing. > >“This is knowingly supporting the sexualization of young females’ bodies,” said Riley. “We are not adults we are children. They are making it seem like there is something about our bodies we should hide.” The fruits of sexual liberation of women (and apparently teen girls now) are that these foolish females are the ones that sexualized their own bodies. If they'd worn decent clothing and *NOT* been sexualizing their own bodies for that "male gaze," then they would never have seen these edits. This is the equivalent of walking around in a fetishistic costume and then complaining that "people are looking at meeeeeeee!" They picked that low-cut top because it showed off their teen cleavage. They picked that top that left them bare from the armpits up because they thought it made them look "hot." These girls know what they're doing, and why, and what their audience is, and they are totally into it and totally get off on the attention. But the school *INTERFERED WITH* their attention-grabbing "hot sexy" bullshit, and *THAT* is what truly pissed these THOTs off.