WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

391

(post is archived)

[–] 8 pts

Yes. Family frequently guarded them at night to ensure skirts were not lifted. If they had no one, they are frequently humiliated by servicing unknown men. Either hole was fair game. As they could not look behind them, they remained anonymous. Some men pulled out. Some didn't.

Women were incentivized to not cause problems which involved magistrates and punishment.

While this is cruel, I now understand why they once did stuff like this.

[–] 5 pts

That would definitely be an appeal to not be a slut, however in today's world, i cant help but feel this would be a turn on to some. However, nothing good comes from giving women any kind of power, they simply corrupt it instantly

[–] 3 pts

If true that's insanely fucked up. If.

[–] 1 pt

There was no shortage of fucked up things back in the day.

https://www.elitereaders.com/old-torture-methods-women-broke-law/

[–] 4 pts

Eh... there's a big difference between putting someone in stocks (common punishment) and putting them in stocks unguarded all night with the implicit social understanding that it's fair game for as many men to rape them as they like.

Also, womens' studies professors have a habit of inventing and spreading rumours about old laws regarding women. Like the "rule of thumb" myth.