'Upward-thrusting buildings ejaculating into the sky' – do cities have to be so sexist?

Donate

Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

494

•

'Upward-thrusting buildings ejaculating into the sky' – do cities have to be so sexist? (www.theguardian.com)

I mean I'm pretty sure its for real... But I just can't tell anymore.

I mean I'm *pretty sure* its for real... But I just can't tell anymore.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (12).

[–] • 1 pt

Whatever hairypits. Go build your own subterranean womb-city or whatever and see how that goes.

link

[–] • 1 pt

Gasp! Is that... Sexism I'm reading?!?! Who hurt you sweaty?

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

That pussyhat makes you look fat and lesbian.

No, don't take it off, it suits you. And that's my fetish!

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

Oh my god he's hitting on me! What do I do? Do I accuse him of rape? No that would scare him off...

I know! I'll talk endlessly about Sylvia Plath! Then he'll see how smart and different and interesting I am!

parent
link

/s/Feminism

created ago

About this sub

Feminism, the force of change that dragged women away from a nuclear family and taught them that men were evil. When they hit 30 or 40, they realize they've been had and go cry out for any man who will take them. This is where we laugh at them and point out their bullshit.

[1] This is the joke: Freedom of speech means 3rd wave Feminists will be "triggered".

[2] Relevance: Ridicule of 3rd wave Feminism, historical discussion of 1st and 2nd wave Feminism, or speculation of 4th wave Feminism.

[3] Highlighting Hypocrisy: Any post that highlights the Hypocrisy of a Feminist claim is not only allowed, but passively encouraged.

[4] Down voting on topic content is a ban-able offence at the owners and moderators discretion.