The Q reference wasn't a hit on your intelligence per say. More the quality of material you may have been referencing. I do not disavow Q, but I believe many just don't get it. They followed the path of believing "other peoples" interpretation of Q. There would be no tactical reasoning behind trying to gain advantage in "this" conversation. If I'm not willing to try and understand your reality then there would be no point in trying to understand reality at all. We all have our own which makes up the whole. If it is like Pat says, how would we be able to know? Are we not just a neural network ourselves? Wirelessly connected via frequencies/waves? Are we bots? Can we prove it either way whether to ourselves or others?