WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

642

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

There's nothing to see. You clearly don't understand what a nueral network is. You must have read a Q article or something.

I have literally used neural networking in some of my code. Its just a subset of machine learning. I know how all of this works and I knew about it before Q told you.

Many companies use it besides Facebook. Again the neural network alone is nothing. The code feeding/training it is the problem.

Its like you are saying a brain is dangerous. When in fact its not. Its the thoughts, ideas, images, and sounds that train a brain to be good/bad.

[–] 0 pt

You've become beguiled by fanciful fabrications of something you never understood. Not only does this have nothing at all to do with Q, your demonstrating how anxious the prospect of you being wrong makes you look like you feel guilty, inadequate or something else sort of similar. This is like when the Mockingbirds talk about how Q is secretly behind every opposition to their masters. Thinking someone is completely ruined because you have one disagreement with them is sort of pitiful. Not only do you not understand Q, you're too eager to pounce on anyone you seem to think is adjacent to it. You really don't see what you're doing, do you?

It's sad. You may even be the kind of person that would be able to see it. Out of pity and not much more, I'll throw you a bone. Find out who Patrick Ryan is.

[–] 0 pt

I know all about the Dark Stoa. I know who Patrick Ryan is. The butterfly war... yada yada

You just keep firing back with elegant nuh uhs. The fact is on its own a Neural Network can do nothing its literally blank code structure.

A.I. is what you mean to be saying. Not neural network. Thats all i'm saying.

A gun is not dangerous until it is given input...

[–] 0 pt

You know about Dark Stoa and Pat, but you don't see what I'm pointing you to? AI isn't enough, but their use is widely known. I'm not saying that. What I'm saying is DARPA created the infancy of a neural network and handed it over to the CIA. If you know about what Pat presents, then you know why LifeLog being a Neural Network matters. I don't see what this unearned malice is about. You're saying you understanding what I'm pointing to but also saying LifeLog being a Neural Network doesn't matter. This seems like a bold contradiction.