Without additional context, this doesn't seem too strange. They were alerted to threats over a year ago, and the local sheriff's office conducted a investigation, but was unable to establish probable cause to take further action, at least not enough to confiscate guns owned by the father.. maybe there was case for terroristic threats or some similar charge.
This senario is the excuse for red flag laws. I don't agree that these are the answer to the issue. The problem isn't that the child had access to guns, but that he was able to take advantage of a place with security vulnerabilities.
I wonder if educational facilities should be subject to random security audits..
"The only answer to a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun."
With all of that said, it would not suprise me if the FBI had a deeper connection with the subject.
(post is archived)