So you are ok with child prostitution as ling as everyone consents. Got it.
No, I am obviously not ok with that at all.
This is a discussion board, not a place to write a novel. I can't convey every nuance of libertarian theory here.
However, what's great about the internet is that you have access to the largest repository of human knowledge ever collected.
A great deal of that knowledge is about libertarianism. At any time you like, you can learn how a free society might deal with the problems of child sexual abuse, or drugs, or any other social problem.
There is a wealth of literature just a quick web search away.
The fact that you have not done that, and are quick to make judgments and pronouncements about a philosophy that you know nothing about, shows that you are not an intellectually honest human being.
And for that reason, I will not engage with you further.
Nice novel. Would read again.
Why are you still wasting my time?
I have done that, actually. I find no way that you actually prevent it.
When did I say sexual abuse? Child is consenting, remember? If everybody consents, it's ok.
Same with porn - it's a victimless crime, right? Except we have plenty of evidence that it is incredibly harmful and addictive. First hit is free, nobody get;s hurt, right?
So save me your philosophical fantasies of libertarianism - they are Jewish tricks not worth considering. The fact that Libertarianism still falls onto "well, it's the addicts fault, not the dealers/pusher's fault" is exactly what allows Jewish Pornographers to thrive.
Children can give consent. A one-year old can't enter into a contract of any kind, whether it's a rental lease or for sexual activity.
If you had actually done basic research into libertarianism, you would already know this.
But you don't, because you are either a dishonest person, or you're an idiot.
I will assume you are both, as well as a third thing -- a waste of my time.
(post is archived)