He was only exercising his legal rights when he shot an unarmed 17-year-old girl in the back of the head. He believed he was standing his ground, and that's why he didn't tell anyone about it until authorities started closing in on him three days later.
At this stage, I don't see any reason to doubt that the jury will agree with him.
He was only exercising his legal rights when he shot an unarmed 17-year-old girl in the back of the head. He believed he was standing his ground, and that's why he didn't tell anyone about it until authorities started closing in on him three days later.
At this stage, I don't see any reason to doubt that the jury will agree with him.
(post is archived)