Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

139

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts 2y

Ok, Twitter interfered with elections. But just to be clear -

Did Twitter interfere more with elections than AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), or did they interfere less than AIPAC?

[–] • 1 pt 2y (edited 2y)

What the difference, it's the same management. .

[–] • 2 pts 2y

"RUSSIA COLLUSION!!!!!"

Meanwhile, in the US, actual election interference.

[–] • 1 pt 2y (edited 2y)

Anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of law. I really don't understand why Elon would provide ammunition for legal action against Twitter, a company that he privately owns, unless this is all just globalist kabuki theater meant to get people onto the Elon train to the FEMA camps.

[–] • 0 pt 2y

At this point it's the only theory that makes sense.

[–] • 1 pt 2y

in before "it wasn't enough to affect the outcomes"

[–] • 1 pt 2y

Meh, come on man, after a thorough, extensive and complete investigation we conclude that it did not reach the threshold of Criminal interference and therefore determine no actual crime was committed, even if they wanted too - which they didn't ... something something.