WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

In legal matter? No. In any presentation of self which may prove injurious to the party. A blue check mark is supposed to lend credibility they are the party they claim to be. As such, it opens the door for criminal and civil liabilities. Nothing you stated changes this.

[–] 0 pt

A blue check mark is not a legal distinction. You're intentionally mincing things that aren't relatable to try to seem either smart or correct. Twitter has zero legal requirement to verify anyone with w blue checkmark. This is what you do though. This is how you think you totally own people in nonarguments you have.

[–] 0 pt

It doesn't require a legal distinction. It only requires that it gives the appearance of credibility to the average person. Which it does.