Remember, they have a 10:1 manager:worker ratio. If the average worker is $250K, managers are probably $300K-$350K. If you assume money laundering with non-existent people, simply account, lets bullshit our way into some numbers. 7000 employees. 50% let go. 3500 people. Assume 10% of the 90% are money laundering accounts. So 315 laundering accounts. At $350K per account, that's $110,250,000 laundered for whatever nefarious purpose. Politics, kids, drugs, bribes. Whatever. If we assume 90% of the 90% are money laundering accounts, that's $992,250,000. Almost a billion dollars per year. Even if they are only allocating $250K for those accounts, that's $708,750,000 per year. I'd bet at least some of those accounts are pulling $400K. Gosh, I wonder why Twitter has been losing billions and has basically never been profitable. Gosh, why is a company which has never been profitable, bleeding billions, a darling on Wall Street? Obviously my numbers are bullshit, but I broke them out to make the point. No real company has a 10:1 ratio of managers to workers. None. Twitter has historically existed for mind control, narrative control, and money laundering.