Remember, they have a 10:1 manager:worker ratio. If the average worker is $250K, managers are probably $300K-$350K. If you assume money laundering with non-existent people, simply account, lets bullshit our way into some numbers.

7000 employees. 50% let go. 3500 people.

Assume 10% of the 90% are money laundering accounts. So 315 laundering accounts.

At $350K per account, that's $110,250,000 laundered for whatever nefarious purpose. Politics, kids, drugs, bribes. Whatever.

If we assume 90% of the 90% are money laundering accounts, that's $992,250,000. Almost a billion dollars per year. Even if they are only allocating $250K for those accounts, that's $708,750,000 per year. I'd bet at least some of those accounts are pulling $400K.

Gosh, I wonder why Twitter has been losing billions and has basically never been profitable. Gosh, why is a company which has never been profitable, bleeding billions, a darling on Wall Street?

Obviously my numbers are bullshit, but I broke them out to make the point. No real company has a 10:1 ratio of managers to workers. None. Twitter has historically existed for mind control, narrative control, and money laundering.

I would assume that their contracts were reviewed before hand. If it is stipulated that employment is 'at will' they're fucked. Unless there was some egregious conduct discovered during code reviews that Musk engaged in that could warrant on-the-spot termination. Given the fact that notice is being done virtually and that all swipe access to the building is frozen I'm leaning it's quite possible there is ample reason.

Welcome back to reality, pussies.

Time to get a real job.