WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

417

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Option 3: Use the deep state to move the deal forward, blame Elon anyways and pass signature legislation to kneecap anything he does for "security" or some other bullshit premise

[–] 1 pt

If Musk can't show a preponderance of evidence of fraud, he'll have to go forward with the deal or forfeit $1 billion, cash. If he does forfeit, that's a ton of revenue that'd make Twitter stockholders happy. So no, the news isn't happy.

[–] 1 pt

Yeah right. $1 billion is nothing in comparison to Elon destroying all remaining credibility (in the eyes of investors) that Twitter management has left. Shareholders are going to go ape shit.

$1 billion is a bucket of piss compared to getting bought out by Elon.

[–] 0 pt

If Twatter admitted that it only samples 100 accounts in determining the percentage of bots, that's basically an admission of fraud itself. The only reason to use such a tiny sample is to bias the results. It's almost certainly an automated process, so there's no real reason not to sample more accounts anyway.

That said I expect if it hits the courts it will be with an ultra-far left shitlib kike judge who will pretend that deliberately kneecapping your own bot detection is standard procedure and that if the real number is much greater than 5% that's fine because shareholders and advertisers shouldn't expect to get the service they paid for.