You're misinformed. Section 230 applies regardless.
230, if applied correctly, means they are not allowed to delete your speech at all, or they become a publisher, who is now responsible for all comments on their platform.
I've read the document when it was passed.
Effectively it stops a site from being sued for comments made on their site
Correct, they dont delete tweets, they force the user to delete the tweet to continue using their services to get around that little loophole. Elon hasnt oficially bought twitter yet, nothing has changed and this has always been twitters ToS. If OP did the research beofre posting this they would have seen plenty of people point this out.
So, they have been applying 230 correctly?
Interesting
OP may or not be a fag, but his wife and children would disagree
Only because the courts are completely corrupt.
(post is archived)