Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.0K

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (36).
[–] • 4 pts

I concur. From any sane perspective, it's the only way to maintain Section 230 protection. Otherwise it's a publisher and can take liability for content.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

You're misinformed. Section 230 applies regardless.

[–] • 1 pt

230, if applied correctly, means they are not allowed to delete your speech at all, or they become a publisher, who is now responsible for all comments on their platform.

I've read the document when it was passed.

Effectively it stops a site from being sued for comments made on their site

[–] • 1 pt

Correct, they dont delete tweets, they force the user to delete the tweet to continue using their services to get around that little loophole. Elon hasnt oficially bought twitter yet, nothing has changed and this has always been twitters ToS. If OP did the research beofre posting this they would have seen plenty of people point this out.

[–] • 0 pt

Only because the courts are completely corrupt.