AudioCD format has no appropriate error correction mechanism, so it's more difficult to recover when an error is met.
With overburning, you leave the safe territory of the CD surface at the risk of more errors, so when these are encountered (which can't be avoided) the drive tries to work harder to read the audio data.
So I am not the only one familiar with these things.
I am sure you know what C1 and C2 errors are.
Yes.
I remember when some people had the idea that you could write data in AudioCD format so that you could gain in capacity, without thinking that they sacrifice the necessary volume originally reserved for data integrity.
That's indeed interesting. Lately I have been thinking about BR media and whether I should trust them, as people use optical media less and less these days and I have a fear that BR hasn't been tested broadly enough yet.
as people use optical media less and less these days
Because they don't know the benefits.
There are a few additional issues such as:
- Proprietary optical drive firmwares
- Some optical drives do not allow error scanning (e.g. HL-DT-ST. TSSTcorp sadly quit in 2016.)
- HD-DVD with the more physically robust centered data layer, instead of co-existing like DVD+ and DVD-, never made it.
- DVD+RW DL that could have been read-only supported by existing optical drives, only made it to prototype.
(post is archived)