WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

197

Archive: https://archive.today/fe51O

From the post:

>Scientists have understood for many years that internet voting is insecure and that there is no known or foreseeable technology that can make it secure. Still, vendors of internet voting keep claiming that, somehow, their new system is different, or the insecurity doesn’t matter. Bradley Tusk and his Mobile Voting Foundation keep touting internet voting to journalists and election administrators; this whole effort is misleading and dangerous.

Archive: https://archive.today/fe51O From the post: >>Scientists have understood for many years that internet voting is insecure and that there is no known or foreseeable technology that can make it secure. Still, vendors of internet voting keep claiming that, somehow, their new system is different, or the insecurity doesn’t matter. Bradley Tusk and his Mobile Voting Foundation keep touting internet voting to journalists and election administrators; this whole effort is misleading and dangerous.
[–] 1 pt (edited )

Internet voting is insecure and should not be used in public elections

So you know for sure that it will be used in (s)elections.

Who do you think will win? (((Politician))) or (((4chan)))?