They cheated just like this in 2020, they got away with it. Why would they stop doing it?
They cheated just like this in 2020, they got away with it. Why would they stop doing it?
This is an ALGORITHM trying to figure out a math problem. That math problem is YOU.
Every Californian needs to understand what just happened. You’re Redder thank you think.
They robbed votes from Steve Garvey, in plain view, in front of everyone.
Steve Garvey was leading Adam Schiff with 1.8 million votes. And just like that, it was cut in half.
This is called the Glitch Switch. Adam Schiff got more votes in the end by a razor-thin margin.
Almost statistically impossible
Adam Schiff- 1,247,723– 33.2% Steve Garvey- 1,220,683- 32.5%
Elections are an additive process. That should be easily understood. Votes are GATHERED, increasing over time, NEVER shed. EVERY candidate’s vote totals should go nowhere but up. Maybe remain static if it’s a small election somewhere rural. But NEVER EVER should that tally decrease.
Each raw data interval of reported votes should be an additive process, and you’d shouldn’t see ANY DELETIONS or OSCILLATIONS.
First Reported by (X: jaaaniceeeee)
>This is an ALGORITHM trying to figure out a math problem. That math problem is YOU.
>Every Californian needs to understand what just happened. You’re Redder thank you think.
>They robbed votes from Steve Garvey, in plain view, in front of everyone.
>Steve Garvey was leading Adam Schiff with 1.8 million votes. And just like that, it was cut in half.
>This is called the Glitch Switch. Adam Schiff got more votes in the end by a razor-thin margin.
>Almost statistically impossible
>Adam Schiff- 1,247,723– 33.2%
Steve Garvey- 1,220,683- 32.5%
>Elections are an additive process. That should be easily understood. Votes are GATHERED, increasing over time, NEVER shed. EVERY candidate’s vote totals should go nowhere but up. Maybe remain static if it’s a small election somewhere rural. But NEVER EVER should that tally decrease.
>Each raw data interval of reported votes should be an additive process, and you’d shouldn’t see ANY DELETIONS or OSCILLATIONS.
>First Reported by (X: jaaaniceeeee)
(post is archived)