Photos Leaked of Horrific January 6 Prisoner Abuse - Tortured 5 Months in Isolation in a Closet Room with Light on and a Bucket for a Toilet -- Where are the ACLU, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch?

[–] • 7 pts

Me it's not so much the lack of action on the part of ACLU, AI, and HRW that I find shocking, I mean it's expected because orange man bad, they're pieces of shit nothing should be expected from them except facilitating pedophilia and child trafficking, they're all fronts for the same bunch

It's magatards that I find disappointing and right wing americans in general, there should be a massive support for those guys and instead what I see is nothing at all or barely anything worth mentioning

And it's a shame, because it sends the worst type of message. It says you're on your own to anybody on "our side". The left, jews, any criminal organization worth a shit, they never make that mistake. They insist on backing their own and they want it to be known "you work for us we have your back, you fuck with us you're dead"

link

[–] • 5 pts

"Weak men create hard times." Conservatives don't realize that they're the weak men.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

One becomes weak by resting on his laurels, and it's even worse when the said laurels aren't even yours...

See muslims? One source of the problems that they have in the west with their males, is that from day one, the male is told he won everything he's number one, just by virtue of being muslim to begin with, as opposed to dirty kuffar, and he's the male of the family, as opposed to his sister, his name is even mohamed, above it's the sun, there's no upgrade

And what happens, not always but quite often as a result, is that the sister gets it from day 1; either she can afford to tell them to gofuckthemeselves or she'll end up subjugated just like mom, in the kitchen and stfu

So muslim females tend to outperform muslim males when it comes to anything career... And why would she support or settle for some random underachiever while she can get better? Because she can afford to choose, because she earns a "6 figure salary" now...

You can't improve perfection, you can't modify perfection because it's perfect so it makes no sense to change anything whatsoever, that's the issue with anything deemed perfect, such as islam for instance, but I digress...

...

Conservatives, tend to start with the premise that all past achievements are theirs. Achievements of real or supposed ancestors, founding fathers and such, that they built civilization essentially because decadence came with progressives and the further you go in the past the closer you get to what's to be conserved... Logic, sort of... So they have a tendency to rest on "their" laurels with that train of thoughts, they are positioning themselves in a defensive position, merely reacting in the end... While the revolutionaries worked and work their asses off to undo all so called conservative's real or supposed past achievements, by subverting and debasing society at every level... And you know the saying conservatives of today are progressives of yesterday... Sort of lack of circumspection/situational awareness, in the end.

They also tend to want to win a certain way, not necessarily the way they can but the way they want... By applying political methods, road maps, solutions, that are from a different era... A long gone era... With "ingredients" that are no longer available... Again, lack of circumspection.

But that's just one aspect of the problem

Take "rugged individualism" for instance, it's a classic pillar of conservatives' values, and there's nothing wrong with it, it's desirable. Problem is that it more often than not devolved into sheer egoism, selfishness, as in every man for himself and god for all... The problem is that the collective/cooperative action, the team work of an organized bunch, pretty much always prevails over the action of a disorganized one, if we were to oppose the two, that's game theory 101

And on that particular point, the collective, the left is pretty solid despite all its real or supposed flaws, while the right/conservatives... Well they tend to play perso, for cultural reasons mostly, in both cases...

One becomes weak by resting on his laurels, and it's even worse when the said laurels aren't even yours... See muslims? One source of the problems that they have in the west with their males, is that from day one, the male is told he won everything he's number one, just by virtue of being muslim to begin with, as opposed to dirty kuffar, and he's the male of the family, as opposed to his sister, his name is even mohamed, above it's the sun, there's no upgrade And what happens, not always but quite often as a result, is that the sister gets it from day 1; either she can afford to tell them to gofuckthemeselves or she'll end up subjugated just like mom, in the kitchen and stfu So muslim females tend to outperform muslim males when it comes to anything career... And why would she support or settle for some random underachiever while she can get better? Because she can afford to choose, because she earns a "6 figure salary" now... You can't improve perfection, you can't modify perfection because it's perfect so it makes no sense to change anything whatsoever, that's the issue with anything deemed perfect, such as islam for instance, but I digress... ... Conservatives, tend to start with the premise that all past achievements are theirs. Achievements of real or supposed ancestors, founding fathers and such, that they built civilization essentially because decadence came with progressives and the further you go in the past the closer you get to what's to be conserved... Logic, sort of... So they have a tendency to rest on "their" laurels with that train of thoughts, they are positioning themselves in a defensive position, merely reacting in the end... While the revolutionaries worked and work their asses off to undo all so called conservative's real or supposed past achievements, by subverting and debasing society at every level... And you know the saying conservatives of today are progressives of yesterday... Sort of lack of circumspection/situational awareness, in the end. They also tend to want to win a certain way, not necessarily the way they can but the way they want... By applying political methods, road maps, solutions, that are from a different era... A long gone era... With "ingredients" that are no longer available... Again, lack of circumspection. But that's just one aspect of the problem Take "rugged individualism" for instance, it's a classic pillar of conservatives' values, and there's nothing wrong with it, it's desirable. Problem is that it more often than not devolved into sheer egoism, selfishness, as in every man for himself and god for all... The problem is that the collective/cooperative action, the team work of an organized bunch, pretty much always prevails over the action of a disorganized one, if we were to oppose the two, that's game theory 101 And on that particular point, the collective, the left is pretty solid despite all its real or supposed flaws, while the right/conservatives... Well they tend to play perso, for cultural reasons mostly, in both cases...

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

True. Too many conservative men use the comparison against liberal (wo)men as the basis for determining whether they are strong or weak when they really should be comparing themselves to the real men who went to war in WW1 or WW2 or the men who literally founded and built America up from nothing. Those men were legitimately worth respecting, hence why the jews created multiple global wars to throw all the strongest white men into the meat grinder.