This may sound cringe, but I recommend everyone stop using the term child porn and describe what it is as child abuse images/material.
I recommend everyone stop using the term child porn and describe what it is as child abuse
The problem with doing this, apart from it being completely unnecessary, is that it is imprecise. Child porn and child abuse are two different things. Yes, the making of child porn may entail child abuse, but porn is different from abuse. Porn involves sexual arousal, which is not necessarily going to happen in cases of abuse. Porn is usually published, in the sense of being shared widely, whereas abuse is often a private affair that is hidden from others.
It should be called child sexual abuse material. I think calling it child porn cheapens what is really occurring.
You sound like someone who enjoys child abuse material. Any "porn" made with children is abuse.
child porn on its own is a revolting term that ought to make anyone feel repulsed, child abuse material is too vague and sounds like lawyer speak since child abuse material could be a wooden spoon momma smacked her kid with, child porn is definitive and leaves nothing to interpretation.
Abuse is already implied with 'child porn'
Also let me state again. Nudity is not prerequisite for material to be child porn.
Also, pedophiles are attracted towards innocence of children so they can corrupt them. Children playing innocently is the most arousing thing real pedophile could experience. Porn is not even required to arouse pedos. Merely videos of innocent children playing.
How do you think I know these specifics?
Use your brain.
Because you are a pedophile? Thats what your post implies, feel free to be more specific with that one and come back at me.
(post is archived)