Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

526

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

Of course the CP was allowed to Twitter. The whole point of CP laws is that our powerful friends can recruit new members.

How do you think our organization can recruit new members. They must prove that they are capable of committing extreme acts of evil without concience.

That's not even the point. They also run all CP sites so that they can test who is retarded enough to visit them because they can't control their urges. They also require that no prospective member has committed any sexual acts towards children. The point is to recruit pedophiles that are capable enough to show self-restraint and not do that stuff without explicit permission. Read that bold line and see what that implies.

Then check all powerful men that have such accusations leveled against them and make the conclusion. Your mind will be blown.

Ps. Check COPINE scale. Netflix's Cuties is child pornography. The fact that everyone involved in producing it is not in jail for it and for child abuse shows how selectively CP laws are enforced

https://uk-database.org/cold-cases-missing-murdered-uk-kids-can-u-help/uk-child-abusers-named-and-shamed/childhood-abuses/paedophile-party-members/

[–] • 2 pts

This may sound cringe, but I recommend everyone stop using the term child porn and describe what it is as child abuse images/material.

[–] • 1 pt

I recommend everyone stop using the term child porn and describe what it is as child abuse

The problem with doing this, apart from it being completely unnecessary, is that it is imprecise. Child porn and child abuse are two different things. Yes, the making of child porn may entail child abuse, but porn is different from abuse. Porn involves sexual arousal, which is not necessarily going to happen in cases of abuse. Porn is usually published, in the sense of being shared widely, whereas abuse is often a private affair that is hidden from others.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

It should be called child sexual abuse material. I think calling it child porn cheapens what is really occurring.

You sound like someone who enjoys child abuse material. Any "porn" made with children is abuse.

[–] • 1 pt

child porn on its own is a revolting term that ought to make anyone feel repulsed, child abuse material is too vague and sounds like lawyer speak since child abuse material could be a wooden spoon momma smacked her kid with, child porn is definitive and leaves nothing to interpretation.

Abuse is already implied with 'child porn'

[–] • 0 pt

Also let me state again. Nudity is not prerequisite for material to be child porn.

Also, pedophiles are attracted towards innocence of children so they can corrupt them. Children playing innocently is the most arousing thing real pedophile could experience. Porn is not even required to arouse pedos. Merely videos of innocent children playing.

How do you think I know these specifics?

Use your brain.

[–] • 0 pt

Because you are a pedophile? Thats what your post implies, feel free to be more specific with that one and come back at me.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

He is a jew and a faggot. They love porn and run the world industry.