What makes you think they won't just ignore the evidence? They'll call it weak or circumstantial or say that the errors were random and didn't effect the outcome of some other bullshit. They know that you know that they cheat. They don't care.
What makes you think they won't just ignore the evidence? They'll call it weak or circumstantial or say that the errors were random and didn't effect the outcome of some other bullshit. They know that you know that they cheat. They don't care.
(post is archived)