John Fetterman needs to be a mental patient not a candidate
John Fetterman needs to be a mental patient not a candidate
I'm sure the Biden administration and incoming giga jew governor will look into this.
I'm sure the Biden administration and incoming giga jew governor will look into this.
I understand it's illegal.. but does that shit even work?
If some faggot walked up to me telling me who to vote for, I'd tell them to fuck off and then I'd let the election officials at the location know.
"Hey, vote for the retard when you get in there." "Yeah no, I don't think so, go fuck yourself, dipshit faggot."
Would that shit really change anyone's vote?
Again, not saying "it's ok" since it is, in fact, illegal. I'm more questioning the efficacy of such a strategy more than anything.
I understand it's illegal.. but does that shit even work?
If some faggot walked up to me telling me who to vote for, I'd tell them to fuck off and then I'd let the election officials at the location know.
"Hey, vote for the retard when you get in there." "Yeah no, I don't think so, go fuck yourself, dipshit faggot."
Would that shit really change anyone's vote?
Again, not saying "it's ok" since it is, in fact, illegal. I'm more questioning the efficacy of such a strategy more than anything.
It may work in the Dem cities where a % of the electorate feeds off the corruption of the Dem party and another % fears retribution if they don't go along to get along. Drug dealers, coddled drug addicts, criminals, welfare, trans, LGBTQ, etc. Maybe the Dems pick up 1%-2% with this tactic of telling voters who they should vote for.
It may work in the Dem cities where a % of the electorate feeds off the corruption of the Dem party and another % fears retribution if they don't go along to get along. Drug dealers, coddled drug addicts, criminals, welfare, trans, LGBTQ, etc. Maybe the Dems pick up 1%-2% with this tactic of telling voters who they should vote for.
I suppose if you go to the polls with no idea who you're voting for.. but..people do that?
I suppose if you go to the polls with no idea who you're voting for.. but..people do that?
I dunno. I don't live in a Dem infested shithole city. I've seen so many videos of the inner city zombies that I could easily believe there are many people who would sell their vote for little money, or verbal security that their life sustaining crumbs will continue only if they vote a certain way, or criminals who know who their friends are (that keep them out of jail) and abide by their election wishes. Dems demand leverage over those on their plantation.
I dunno. I don't live in a Dem infested shithole city. I've seen so many videos of the inner city zombies that I could easily believe there are many people who would sell their vote for little money, or verbal security that their life sustaining crumbs will continue only if they vote a certain way, or criminals who know who their friends are (that keep them out of jail) and abide by their election wishes. Dems demand leverage over those on their plantation.
To be seen by FEW and cared about by even less
To be seen by FEW and cared about by even less
Oh... VERITAS? lol Definitely nothing will come of this then. Count on it. Johnny (Sling-Blade) Fetterman is going to be just fine if Veritas is reporting that he broke a law lol lol. Nothing at all comes of Veritas stuff. Never has. Not one time. Prove me wrong.
Oh... VERITAS? lol Definitely nothing will come of this then. Count on it. Johnny (Sling-Blade) Fetterman is going to be just fine if Veritas is reporting that he broke a law lol lol. Nothing at all comes of Veritas stuff. Never has. Not one time. Prove me wrong.
Early in his career, O'Keefe got ACORN shut the fuck down. Of course, the dems just brought it back, albeit with a new name.
Generally speaking, I think what Veritas does is necessary. If what they're doing doesn't bear fruit, it's more a reflection of government dysfunction and dereliction of duty than it is Veritas' "ineffectiveness". But exposing corruption MUST be done in order to have positive change, whether peacefully or otherwise, because people need to know what's happening in order to become pissed off and do anything about it.
Early in his career, O'Keefe got ACORN shut the fuck down. Of course, the dems just brought it back, albeit with a new name.
Generally speaking, I think what Veritas does is necessary. If what they're doing doesn't bear fruit, it's more a reflection of government dysfunction and dereliction of duty than it is Veritas' "ineffectiveness". But exposing corruption MUST be done in order to have positive change, whether peacefully or otherwise, because people need to know what's happening in order to become pissed off and do anything about it.
(post is archived)