WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

160

Torrance County, NM recently held an audit of their primary election and the results were presented today, showing a 25% difference between machine and hand count results. The problem was with Dominion tabulators, which consistently undercounted republican votes.

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/dominion-tabulators-malfunction-in-new-mexico/

>Torrance County, NM recently held an audit of their primary election and the results were presented today, showing a 25% difference between machine and hand count results. The problem was with Dominion tabulators, which consistently undercounted republican votes. https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/dominion-tabulators-malfunction-in-new-mexico/

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

It's not a problem, it's a feature!

[–] 1 pt

As I've been saying for almost two years, the electronic voting machines are the problem. The printing of fake ballots is noise in comparison. A shift of 25% is huge. This is what "defeated" Trump (he wasn't defeated, he won) in 2020, not the mail-in votes, not the printing of ballots, not the failure of the media to cover the Hunter Biden story. It was the rigged voting machines that did it. Of course, his victory was so massive, the Democrats still had to print ballots in key states to push that fence post, Biden, over the top numerically. But that was the final cutting of the throat after the sword was already through Trump's heart.

[–] 0 pt

the electronic voting machines are the problem

The only change I would make is "biggest" because, as you listed, there are many problems of varying scale - i.e. the electronic voting machines are the biggest problem

Otherwise I'm in total agreement with you.

[–] 0 pt

so lets make a law that makes it illegal to inspect your internet connected, privately owned voting tabulation machine. problem solved.

[–] 1 pt

Sounds like the only solution that will work.