Why would Sidney and other defendants in lawsuits not be able to get rid of the lawsuit via motion under anti-SLAPP statutes (a motion that their speech is on a matter of public concern , such as election integrity)?
Please excuse the cut and paste from wiki explaining SLAPP "Strategic lawsuits against public participation (also known as SLAPP suits or intimidation lawsuits ), [1] or strategic litigation against public participation, [2] are lawsuits intended to censor, intimidate, and silence critics by burdening them with the cost of a legal defense until they abandon their criticism or opposition."
Why would Sidney and other defendants in lawsuits not be able to get rid of the lawsuit via motion under anti-SLAPP statutes (a motion that their speech is on a matter of public concern , such as election integrity)?
Please excuse the cut and paste from wiki explaining SLAPP
"Strategic lawsuits against public participation (also known as SLAPP suits or intimidation lawsuits ), [1] or strategic litigation against public participation, [2] are lawsuits intended to censor, intimidate, and silence critics by burdening them with the cost of a legal defense until they abandon their criticism or opposition."
(post is archived)