Hold yourself to the same standards you hold me to and prove your contradictory statements.
There was election fraud in 2020.
But no where near enough to overturn the results.
So there was a lie but not a big enough one to count.
How would that work in court? It would all get thrown out. The entire thing would be deemed invalid.
So by your first statement, you could not possibly know the validity of your second statement, so therefore you are ignorant or intentionally deceptive.
Hold yourself to the same standards you hold me to and prove your contradictory statements.
I did. Guess you missed it. We have multiple studies. Multiple.
So there was a lie but not a big enough one to count.
There was more election fraud in the 2020 election than in any other national election in US History. However, it was no where even close to enough fraud to change the election in any county. No one has proven that they bussed in pre-filled ballots in a court of law (this is why it is hilariously dumb to think paper ballots are the most secure form of voting - they are not).
That is a nice opinion you got there. Easily disprovable opinion, but yours nevertheless. Own it.
That is a nice opinion you got there.
Not opinion. Facts. I cited a massive study for you already. Actual science. Actual facts.
(post is archived)