WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

645

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt 3y

My big issue so far is the lack of chain of custody of these files they're looking at! If they are looking at a forensic image of a Dominion machine with exterior ipv6 address logs, boom case closed. But... At this point they haven't demonstrated where the image came from!!!

I'm assuming it's legit, but you know what they say about assumptions.

[–] 0 pt 3y

If you're taking flack you're over target.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt 3y

Blah blah blah we’ve been hearing the same movie dialogue from the same people for going on six years now. This has been an objective disaster. The continued refusal to show where the data came from, what the data actually says, how they validated the data, is very telling. They don’t have the packets they said they did. They don’t even understand what it is they are talking about, that’s clear. One amateurish misunderstanding and mistake after another. This is not going well. It’s even worse than I thought it was going to be. I don’t blame Mike, the people he relied on either lied to him or don’t know what they’re doing. This is so embarrassing.

[–] 0 pt 3y

Maybe you're not trusting the plan hard enough

[–] [deleted] 0 pt 3y

That’s dumb on their part. They should continue to broadcast this it’s making us look terrible. He has gibberish, not packets. This is a complete disaster.