WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.5K

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

If the money was being spent on students as they portray it wouldn't matter cause it'd mean fewer students mean fewer resources needed so the budgets can just naturally adjust.

That's not what our kiked education system if about though.

I don't want to hear one word about we need more browns to fund schools. Browns and boards of education belong in the same place.

[–] 0 pt

Schools get paid a fixed amount per student.

[–] 0 pt

I get that. But if the money was used efficiently and mostly for the students than when they had less students they would have less expenditures and be able to manage their budget that way. Since most of public schools is supporting bureaucracy and not students their costs don't go down when the class sizes go down.

[–] 1 pt

I once worked for a charter school that was at one time the largest school in the US, and we got less funds per student than any school in the state, took on all the worst students that got expelled from every other school, and still had a better graduation rate than average. Public schools are a complete joke, and the entire school system needs to be privatized.