![A map of the three main races [1024x768 - 186KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/r2nBhN.jpg){kind=link}
Strange that black aborigines are labeled as “caucasoid.”
Strange that black aborigines are labeled as “caucasoid.”
Lots of odd classifications on the map.
Lots of odd classifications on the map.
I can remember this from elementary school. We were taught that Whites (Caucasoids), asians (Mongoloids), and blacks (Negroids) were three distinct races, each with clearly defined differences.
I think it would have been more correct to label the three as different subspecies.
I can remember this from elementary school.
We were taught that Whites (Caucasoids), asians (Mongoloids), and blacks (Negroids) were three distinct races, each with clearly defined differences.
I think it would have been more correct to label the three as different subspecies.
Wonder what kike advised the World Book Atlas on these Racial classifications ?.... joos and arabs = Fellow White/ Caucasian.
Wonder what kike advised the World Book Atlas on these Racial classifications ?.... joos and arabs = Fellow White/ Caucasian.
They got Hungary as both Caucasians and Mongoloids Mongolians.
They got Hungary as both Caucasians and ~~Mongoloids~~ Mongolians.
I assume the thinking is that there were both in the area.
I assume the thinking is that there were both in the area.
So sand niggers and dot niggers were considered White?
So sand niggers and dot niggers were considered White?
Like I said above, lots of strange classifications on the map.
Like I said above, lots of strange classifications on the map.
Up until the early 20th century irish were barely considered white in the US so... White as in what? As in WASP?
...
It says "caucasian" on the map... Whatever that means. Because yeah, putting maghrebis and and danes in the same basket is quite a stretch in my book, they literally have nothing to do with each others
Look https://pic8.co/sh/5ZmSCg.png
That caucasian category literally puts brits and maghrebis in the same basket, it's garbage. Might as well put whites and mulatos and blacks also under the same label because why not
Up until the early 20th century irish were barely considered white in the US so... White as in what? As in WASP?
...
It says "caucasian" on the map... Whatever that means. Because yeah, putting maghrebis and and danes in the same basket is quite a stretch in my book, they literally have nothing to do with each others
Look https://pic8.co/sh/5ZmSCg.png
That caucasian category literally puts brits and maghrebis in the same basket, it's garbage. Might as well put whites and mulatos and blacks also under the same label because why not
Looks like Australia is populated by Eskimos
Looks like Australia is populated by Eskimos
>I think it would have been more correct to label the three as different subspecies.
Loose groups of subspecies yeah https://pic8.co/sh/5ZmSCg.png
>>I think it would have been more correct to label the three as different subspecies.
Loose groups of subspecies yeah https://pic8.co/sh/5ZmSCg.png
Loose groups of subspecies yeah
The main point I was trying (and failed) to make is that NYC public schools didn't teach "one race - human" when I was first attending them. That came later. We were taught humanoids were made of up three major groups that were not the same as each other.
>
Loose groups of subspecies yeah
The main point I was trying (and failed) to make is that NYC public schools didn't teach "one race - human" when I was first attending them. That came later. We were taught humanoids were made of up three major groups that *were not the same* as each other.
Should have taught "us and the fucking rest"
Should have taught "us and the fucking rest"
(post is archived)