Best way to quit a math teaching job ever!

Uh. That's not how statistics work. This particular paper is using the statistics of 41 million white children, 5 of which live in poverty. That's 12.2%. Then it gives 10 out of 36 million non-white children living in poverty. That's 27.8%. No matter how you adjust the population, 27.8 is always > 12.2.

This is an ingenious statistical trick used by race hustlers and jews, though. I have to give them that credit. "How is it a trick?" you might ask. Black and Hispanic women have more children than White women. That means for every poor woman there are more poor non-white children than white children.

In other words, imagine if two neighbors, one Hispanic family and one white family. The White family only makes $25,000 a year and the Hispanic family earns $35,000 a year. The white family has two kids and the Hispanic family has 4 kids. The way "poverty" is calculated would suggest there's a crisis of institutional racism in our hypothetical town because twice as many Hispanic kids live in poverty as white kids, even though the reality is the spics are making 40% more money than the Whites. Why? Because every time a spic drops an anchor baby the income considered as "below the poverty line" goes up. How's that for bullshit?

If you ever hear a race hustler talking about bullshit statistics like that, ask them to give you the stats on household income for whites and non-whites corrected for education and experience. I'll tip you off that they don't have those statistics because it paints a far different story.

Also ... c -- has an '=' sign between unequal expressions, one of which is the correct answer e & f -- have the right idea, but numerically inaccurate due to double rounding g -- is wrong due to misunderstanding the question h -- is qualitatively right, but the quantitative justification is nonsense so maybe just a lucky guess