Difference being... North Korea is not substituting North Koreans with Subsaharans
Hey, don't forget the Central American jungle shitskins.
Difference being... North Korea is not substituting North Koreans with Subsaharans
Hey, don't forget the Central American jungle shitskins.
Liberals in colleges actually believe this stuff.
Socialist are not humans. They live in the moment like animals.
Those Columbia graduates will go on to be in high positions in America after their brainwash. And their indoctrination will trickle down into the society, mostly through their chain of command. It's a sad world where highly educated does not necessarily mean having wisdom. It just means you were able to absorb a lot of dictation from the higher ups without questioning.
As a college graduate from a top 20 engineering program, most graduates are fucking retarded.
Not necessarily. Innovative and productive people will ultimately rise to the top in the absence of totalitarian control of society and the economy. A lot of these universities seem to operate under the presumption that their past reputations ensure their future reputations. But that’s only true for a relatively short period, and within those retarded university rankings (having a graduate who received a Nobel prize in the 1920s should not be given as much weight as it is in those rankings, and the only reason that qualifier is included is so the likes of Columbia can maintain high positions in spite of current failings.) But if captains of industry, employers etc. come to realise that your graduates are fucking hopeless then they will stop hiring them. Outside the cosseted world of academia profits are what matter, not rankings, not publications, just productivity and profits.
Small buisness hire on merit. Big corps with jew money that are able to take the L are the ones hiring the retards. This is why America is falling.
The answer is in your own comment. They can keep hiring failures and remain relative successes in a failed America so. They will still be outcompeted by merit based non-US firms. Nobody can be shielded from competition in the long run. Companies that have efforts made by their states to shield them from competition will either ultimately fall to foreign firms, or the state that shielded them will ultimately fall to foreign countries.
At the forefront of the innovation and profit only industries, you still coddle to the crowd that only consists of 5% of the population that is LGBTQ. The rainbow flags fly in all the corporation mascots while people like myself wonder why such overt representation is necessary.
Wouldn't profit driven models try to take a stronger hold of the interest of the 95% of their customer base instead of going after the 5% that may not even be interested in their product? If productivity and profit is the ultimate goal, wouldn't it be their priority to shift their products to follow the trend of the consumer interest, not their sexual orientation? I see the signs of coddling for them everywhere on movies, commercials, ads, etc., and I can't possibly have been the only one noticing that trend.
(post is archived)