WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

886

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Cornell University’s Faculty concludes, “This information is useless to protect the community from the perpetrator — unless one believes it is protective to mistrust or avoid all average black men..."

That red pill is so bitter, I can almost taste it from here. If 75% of the crime alerts are from black men (as the article states), and only 6.8% (irp.dpb.cornell.edu) of the student body is black then yes it is "protective to mistrust or avoid all average black men".

[–] 1 pt

It may as well be useless to state their gender, height, etc as well then. Fuck, they may as well just scrap the warning system all together

[–] 0 pt

They're legally not allowed to scrap the warning system. The university (((administrators))) have been trying to hide the reality of race and crime for decades. Back when Congress wasn't completely bought off, there was enough outrage over a black man (jewamongyou.files.wordpress.com) killing a white woman (upload.wikimedia.org) that it was made into law (en.wikipedia.org).

[–] 0 pt

The congressmen who push that kinda shit should have the crimes occur to them...

The whole sketch is amazing, but jump to 6:09 for the part of the sketch that applies to this story.

Triumph the Insult Comic Dog Talks to Young Voters:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j556MWGVVqI