Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.5K

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

It's a good start. Now eliminate ALL sports scholarships.

[–] • 0 pt

Engaging in sports is one thing: builds teamwork, athleticism, and probably some other useful life skills.

The problem is our societal glorification of it, and the absurd amount of attention it gets. The guy who plays hockey is an entertainer; the guy who studies biology and makes breakthrough discoveries in genetics actually contributes to the betterment of society.

Which is not to say that sports don't have a place. They do. But it is vastly overrated and given far too much shrift today.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Sports and Education should be separate. Giving millions of niggers a free ride to college because they can bounce a fucking ball and sending them to every corner of the country is pure Kalergi Plan shit.

[–] • 0 pt

Hrm.

I see your point, but I'm not sure getting rid of sports entirely is the way to go. Getting rid of sports scholarships - absolutely. But plenty of smart white kids are also into athletics for its own sake, and they have other useful benefits.

Getting rid of sports scholarships for college would only be the first step in reducing the number of niggers allowed into our schools. We'd also have to remove the race-based grade and test score adjustments, diversity quotas, and all that.

[–] • 2 pts

This is an easy one if they're serious. Don't fall for the trap of calling out specific majors by name as they'll just change the names. All you have to do is limit scholarships to majors with more than, say, 75% of graduates employed in their field of study.

[–] • 1 pt

Next they can eliminate all courses that don't lead to jobs.

[–] • 0 pt

I disagree. For example, at some point in the future I would like to study ancient european languages (specifically saxon, old norse and old Irish). I know I will never get a job doing these things but I still want to learn.

[–] • 0 pt

There is nothing stopping you from learning these languages, there are probably apps that can do it for free. Universities should only teach things that will lead to direct jobs/skills. Period. Having these non-essential things was the pathway that brought us to feminist dance theory bullshit tier courses, that parents pay for and do nothing but corrupt the minds of kids. I don't think there is anything wrong with any languages, especially the ones you want to learn (they are the languages of my ancestors and I would like to learn then too). Things like languages would be best taught in a school for languages. Feminist dance theory could also have their own schools if they wish, but would not get access to federal funding just because it is attached to a university, so they would actually have to work to provide something of value where people would want to go and pay money for it. A language school would work under its own funding. A feminist dance theory school would close the doors shortly after opening.

[–] • 0 pt

What jobs do philosophy degrees prepare students for, or the classics? Would you also get rid of those degree courses because they don’t produce a direct route to some shitty job? Universities are institutions of learning and education, they are not merely to produce fodder for the investment classes to take advantage of, and if the investment classes want their fodder maybe they should be the ones setting up schools rather than expecting the fodder to pay through their taxes.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

There is nothing stopping you from learning these languages, there are probably apps that can do it for free.

Not to the degree that a university degree would. Old Irish (in particular) is only taught at an undergrad level at one university I'm aware of (NUI Maynooth). The fact is that once you move beyond high school and technical courses, some subjects are very obscure and only taught in universities.

Universities should only teach things that will lead to direct jobs/skills. Period.

Why? The idea that universities should be job training centers everyone should go to is a very new one. The original concept of a classical education was to train the mind rather than teach specific facts, so the learner could approach any situation in adult life and triumph. Hence the focus on subjects like language, philosophy and mathematics.

Having these non-essential things was the pathway that brought us to feminist dance theory bullshit tier courses, that parents pay for and do nothing but corrupt the minds of kids.

Firstly, no. Universities had non job specific courses far longer than they had job specific courses, and the result was not feminist dance theory. That kind of nonsense is a very recent development and correlates with jews, not academic independence.

I don't think there is anything wrong with any languages, especially the ones you want to learn (they are the languages of my ancestors and I would like to learn then too). Things like languages would be best taught in a school for languages.

And it might be useful to have other related disciplines cooperating together in those schools, like history, archeology and classics experts. Almost like a "flowing together." Maybe we could adopt the latin word for such a thing, like "university."

Feminist dance theory could also have their own schools if they wish, but would not get access to federal funding just because it is attached to a university, so they would actually have to work to provide something of value where people would want to go and pay money for it.

Now you've hit the real issue: Public funding of universities. Universities used to get by on grants, fees and endowments, introducing public money into the mix created a central point of failure which jews could and did exploit.

[–] • 0 pt

I got a plumber out to unblock my jacks years ago and when chatting to him he told he had completed a degree in the classics. I asked him how he ended up being a plumber then and he said he’d always been a plumber but had studied classics in his 30s because he was very interested in it. Education can be its own reward and shouldn’t be viewed simply as producing fodder for industry.

[–] • 0 pt

Yep!

I do agree though that public money shouldn't be ploughed into useless degrees.