Reminds me of that guy a black on foxnews I think or CNN a couple of weeks ago, who warned that this BLM shit was one inch away from giving birth to black supremacism
It was rather cryptic, in the sense that I did get what he meant by that, that inevitably this was leaning toward black lives matter only, but at the same time this was "only" more of the same BS on BLM's part in their echo chamber eventually contaminating already contaminated demsheviks
Now with this put in perspective >>a manual for indoctrination of elementary school children into anti-White racism
His prediction takes a whole new dimension
In the case of Black Lives Matter, however, tribalism tends to trump unequal circumstances. In fact, this is becoming more and more the rule for these people, given how they are less and less interested in hearing about how unequal the circumstances really are. By “unequal,” I mean the obscene propensity blacks have for murder, rape, and all other forms of violent crime. No group of people in the United States commits violent crime at the rate of blacks — both against their own ingroup and against outgroups. As a result, non-blacks have good reason to be wary of blacks, and police of all races often have good reason to use force, even lethal force, when apprehending them. These points BLM activists simply ignore, and instead focus on examples of perceived white-on-black crime as an excuse to further their tribalist agenda.
https://www.counter-currents.com/2020/06/black-lives-matter-is-black-supremacy/
It was terry crews btw https://twitter.com/EliotETC/status/1269813798543568896
>Defeating White supremacy without White people creates Black supremacy. Equality is the truth. Like it or not, we are all in this together.
Reality is that, supremacy, I mean factual supremacy, not some sort of fantasized aryan brotherhood type of stuff secretly running america, is a reality by the numbers. In japan you can talk about japanese supremacy, since they are everywhere on their island, competing with little to no ethnic minorities. You could talk about chinese supremacy in china, or black supremacy in africa. I mean it's factual, africa is under black/african supremacy lol
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/supremacy
>The condition or fact of being dominant
...
Now in the american context it's trickier because you have a multi ethnic society founded by whites historically (look at the presidents and look at the founding fathers, obvious)
Now, you have one ethnic group, blacks, calling or supposedly calling to end the still dominant demographic who happens to be from the same ethnic group as the founders of america, namely, european anglo saxons
I say supposedly calling, because a couple of celebs and usual fringe radical groups aside, blacks don't seem to be the main drivers for any of this to begin with, you have a disproportionate amount of whites in the BLM movement, not that much blacks. Also, they aren't really famous for organizing anything, let alone on such scale.
"Somebody" is pushing for an ethnic conflict on an existing ethnic divide, that's a given.
Synagogue of satan comes to mind
Divide and rule, or divide and conquer, in politics and sociology is gaining and maintaining power by breaking up larger concentrations of power into pieces that individually have less power than the one implementing the strategy.
A Captain should endeavor with every art to divide the forces of the enemy. Machiavelli advises that this act should be achieved either by making him suspicious of his men in whom he trusted, or by giving him cause that he has to separate his forces, and, because of this, become weaker.
(post is archived)