See what your say’n there, was thinking you meant revenue losses due to commercial buildings emptied by the many small businesses lost.
Nah. Small business rent was nothing compared to the empty office complexes across the nation.
That’s why you keep hearing these nightmare stories of folks who moved to their ideal home locations in far flung places with hi speed Internet who are now being forced to sell their homes and move back on orders that they either have ass in chair onsite at their companies or lose their jobs by Q4 2023.
That’s just more pain on the wage slave, not a corporation. If there’s a chair in an office building somewhere that needs an ass in it, it’s already being paid for. Maybe having a parent(s) at home building stronger families and possibly homeschooling their children is the bigger issue to the kike world order than any sort of lease loss revenue. They print money out of thin air after all so money lost or gained is secondary to the control over a populace they can get for that money.
Corporations have to justify their expenses. They can’t keep 100,000 square foot office spaces if everybody is offsite.
However, their shareholders (((Blackrock))) tell them that they need to keep corporate facilities to continue to reinforce the cratering commercial real estate market (((that Blackrock is also heavily invested into))).
So, they bring everybody back onsite because “efficiency is improved” despite the fact that employees: - commute an hour a day (or more) - hang out chatting at each other’s desks - get called into more frequent meetings because it’s easier to do so - go out to lunch regularly because they hate being in the office - take more sick days when they work onsite - are more likely to seek alternate employment
All for the sake of their (((shareholders))).
(post is archived)