Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

163

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

ANYONE pushing an EV, is a criminal LIAR. The current state The TECH of a battery will NOT supply the Power need for a Car, to be anything but a Golf cart. The travel in miles of the stated lies has been proven to be less than half. The EV makes headlines everyday for Burning up for No reason. There are almost Zero charging stations in MOST OF America and There NEVER WILL BE, because it cost a massive amount to Make a charging station. The Entire EV. 'Idea' is a LIE.

[–] • 2 pts

Not to mention that many of the existing charging stations (20% or so) are broken. Imagine if 1 in 5 gas stations didn't work for some reason.

[–] • 1 pt

They just don't want you to have a vehicle. The idea is to get rid of cheap ICE cars while only the rich can afford an EV that can drive more than 100 miles before a 2 hour charge.

The whole trick is

yeah EVs aren't as good yet but we need to change for the environment and in 10 years EVs will be better

Except they never will get better, why would they get better if they're forced on people? They will get cheaper, not better. Liberals and kikes love this trick, they force shit on you and promise you it'll be better, you just have to struggle through being an early adopter. And then it gets better. But the lies they tell you never come true, because it's all a scam. It was never meant to get better in time, it was a lie told to get you to take an inferior product under the assumption that it will get better, but it was never planned on getting any better from the start.

[–] • 1 pt

Its a great idea, but the hydrogen cell/water car would be amazingly better.

[–] • 2 pts

Hydrocarbon fuel is just hydrogen and carbon.

We can make it by cracking hydrogen out of water and pulling carbon out of air. It just takes a huge crazy amount of power to do it that way.

That's why we should build a ton of nuke plants. Use nuclear power to make synthetic gasoline and then no one has to change anything personally. Same gas stations, same internal combustion cars.

But no more paying camel fuckers for oil and the process actually removes co² from the air until you burn the gasoline again. It never adds any co² on net so the global warming fags would have nothing to complain about.

"Scientists Would Turn Greenhouse Gas Into Gasoline":

https://archive.ph/tzldN

According to their analysis, their concept, which would cost about $5 billion to build, could produce gasoline at an operating cost of $1.40 a gallon and would turn economically viable when the price at the pump hits $4.60 a gallon, taking into account construction costs and other expenses in getting the gas to the consumer. With some additional technological advances, the break-even price would drop to $3.40 a gallon, they said.

Keep in mind the prices are in 2008 dollars.

[–] • 1 pt

Keep in mind the prices are in 2008 dollars.

So by now, it'd be what saved us from the globalists, if they weren't in charge.

[–] • 2 pts

At this point, I'd prefer my 1970s vintage vehicle. It had no computer chips, no remote telemetry and I could fix it myself.

[–] • 1 pt

The Schwabbites stated intent is to prevent independent travel. This is another Act upon that stage.

[–] • 1 pt

Part of the union's strategy.

The more people actually go on strike the more the UAW has to pay them out of their strike fund.

If they strike only certain plants and departments that force shut downs elsewhere then the subsequently laid off employees are drawing regular unemployment instead of strike pay.

That way you get the effect of a bigger strike without having to actually pay for it out of your own pocket.