It is all just money laundering for the rich.
Nobody who can earn a million dollars would buy an ugly painting. Being savvy with money insists that nobody would pay that much for any art, especially ugly art. It's not profound, if it's ugly it's ugly.
I was told a story when I was a kid called the emperor's New clothes where merchants convinced an emperor that they had the finest silk garments that only intelligent people could see, so to avoid sounding dumb to the merchants he said he could see them and walked around town to show them off. Everyone else agreed that the garments were marvelous because they didn't want to be called dumb either till a kid piped up and yelled "the emperor has no clothes! He's naked!" Then everyone laughed at him. This story is about modern art.
A simple explanation. It is not about the art, it is about the money. If you transfer a million dollars from LA to London, there are taxes and fees. If you buy a painting for a million dollars and transfer the ownership of the "painting" to someone in London, there are no fees and taxes. Even CNN admits there is a problem (cnn.com)
I know that, also buying illegal content, if I wanted to buy some sex slaves I might have to explain where a couple of grand went for my purchase. Paintings are cheap and easy to make when modern art is the standard so I throw garbage at a canvas, buy the slaves but on paper I bought the painting instead. I swear that's what Podesta did and his paintings are trophies (particularly the ones of kids tied up)
Why couldn't those little liberal cunts have thrown tomato soup at this thing?
degenerate jew art anyway
(post is archived)