Seems a bit naive and quite liberal in my view.
My first problem is that selling drugs is not a victimless crime - how many people have died or been irreversibly damaged by things like fentanyl or opiates? Even marijuana nowadays with excessive THC isn’t all that safe and can lead to psychological and cardiovascular problems.
Violence and gang/cartel activity would not cease, it would just change. Have you heard about how the cartels are now in the avocado industry? Those people follow the black markets, and black markets will figure out a way to stay relevant no matter what.
Shitty people will always exist and will always figure out a way to be shitty - governments in essence were developed as a way to protect us from said shitty people. We should fight to bring that concept back instead of disarming individuals further.
You cant commit a crime against yourself. You could make the same arguments to end all the decisions we get to make for ourselves. The logic youre using is the same that the left uses in an attempt to get rid of informed consent in medicine.
It is really easy for law enforcement to break up protection rackets if they dont have drug money and the power that comes with it backing them up. Once you break up a protection racket its actually gone too, its not like there are bunch of farmers putting pressure their friends and acquaintances to get them a new "protector" like there is in the drug business. You take out one dealer, and there are 4 other people waiting to take their spot regardless the consequences. Desperate people dont give a shit if they die. They live in the moment and addiction clouds peoples judgement.
Your making my point in the last part here, shitty people are going to be shitty, and the death penalty isnt a detterent. Handing shitty people a 300 billion dollar a year industry is whats crazy.
(post is archived)