WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

Inhaling burnt particulate matter into your lungs increases chances of major illness.

Oh noes!

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Inhaling burnt particulate matter into your lungs increases chances of major illness.

Really? BUT WEED CURES CANCER! It's just a plant!

Potheads get pretty upset when you speak against the Nigger's Weed aka the Devil's Lettuce.

[–] 0 pt

You make Satan's Salad with the Devil's Lettuce.

[–] 2 pts

B-b-b-ut it grows in nature, I should be able to enhale it into mah lungs!

[–] 4 pts

You can! You can also do this with hemlock, poison ivy, and naturally occurring tar deposits.

Wouldn't suggest it, but you can do it.

[–] 3 pts

do this with hemlock, poison ivy, and naturally occurring tar deposits.

Wouldn't suggest it, but you can do it.

@AOU THIS FAG IS SUGGESTING WE KILL OURSELVES! BAN HIM NOW REEEEEEEEEE!!!

[–] 0 pt

And inject poison ivy intoy eyes because it's natural I can put it anywhere in my body

[–] 4 pts (edited )

Lol... Yeah right. It's a cancer cure. This article is fake and gay. Probably funded by a tobacco company

[–] 4 pts

Now wait just a moment.

I don’t like pot or pot culture.

However, haven’t we known pot is less harmful than cigarettes for a very long time? I’ve never heard of a pot smoker getting lung cancer.

I am suspecting this article is grade-A bullshit.

[–] 1 pt

The opposite is usually true with these rags

[–] 0 pt

Burnt carbon matter will wreak havoc on your respiratory system no matter what.

You could be smoking cauliflower and pumpkin vines and still get respiratory illnesses.

[–] 2 pts

Funny how this never seemed to impact people during the hundreds of years where fireplaces were common.

[–] 1 pt

Most people didn't place a tube directly into the fireplace and breathe deep.

I partake from time to time, but I'm not going to kid myself that it's 100% healthy to consume.

[–] 1 pt

Conclusion Airway inflammation and emphysema were more common in marijuana smokers than in nonsmokers and tobacco-only smokers, although variable interobserver agreement and concomitant cigarette smoking among the marijuana-smoking cohort limits our ability to draw strong conclusions.

https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.212611

[–] 0 pt

56 weed smokers...57 non-smokers and 33 tobacco-only smokers.

Statistically, this is the equivalent of "Trust me, bro, this totally happened.".

published in the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)

These were cancer patients getting CT scans.

[–] 0 pt

The researchers compared chest CT scan results from 56 weed smokers with those of 57 non-smokers and 33 tobacco-only smokers.

Haha, what a huge study. There is a study that proves the opposite with more than 2,000 participants: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/large-study-finds-no-link/

[–] 3 pts

Except this study is not about lung cancer.

Also consider that inflammation is the body's way of attempting to heal itself, so there's that...

[–] 0 pt

So the weed smokers are healing better. SHOCKER.