Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

407

Joe Biden was asked yesterday if he would pardon anyone else. He couched his response, “it depends on some of the language and expectations that Trump broadcasts in the last couple days here as to what he’s going to do,” Biden told reporters at the White House. “There’s still consideration of some folks, but no decision.”

Now, think carefully about that response to the question. Biden handing out more pardons depends on what Donald Trump says he is going to do.

What exactly is the negotiating factor here? If Trump says he will hold people accountable for the weaponization of government, then Biden will preemptively pardon them. However, if President Trump does not say they will be held accountable, then no preemptive action is needed.

No where in that type of thought process is the weaponized targeting and behavior a factor, only whether they will be held accountable for it. Put another way, the activity is admitted as corrupt, the decision now rests on whether they can avoid accountability for their corruption.

There will be more pardons. It doesn’t matter what President Trump says or does not say. Psychologically, they are admitting to the wrongdoing. The issue is now about how to avoid the consequences. There will be more pardons; they are simply negotiating who gets them. . .

>Joe Biden was asked yesterday if he would pardon anyone else. He couched his response, “it depends on some of the language and expectations that Trump broadcasts in the last couple days here as to what he’s going to do,” Biden told reporters at the White House. “There’s still consideration of some folks, but no decision.” >Now, think carefully about that response to the question. Biden handing out more pardons depends on what Donald Trump says he is going to do. >What exactly is the negotiating factor here? If Trump says he will hold people accountable for the weaponization of government, then Biden will preemptively pardon them. However, if President Trump does not say they will be held accountable, then no preemptive action is needed. >No where in that type of thought process is the weaponized targeting and behavior a factor, only whether they will be held accountable for it. Put another way, the activity is admitted as corrupt, the decision now rests on whether they can avoid accountability for their corruption. >There will be more pardons. It doesn’t matter what President Trump says or does not say. Psychologically, they are admitting to the wrongdoing. The issue is now about how to avoid the consequences. There will be more pardons; they are simply negotiating who gets them. . . [Source](https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/01/11/biden-may-blanket-pardon-those-who-targeted-trump-and-those-who-weaponized-government/)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (15).
[–] • 0 pt

December 2012

???

[–] • 1 pt

You know, that whole mayan calendar thing all the hippies were talking about.

[–] • 0 pt

Didn't the hippies go extinct long ago too? Lol!

[–] • 1 pt

During highschool in the 90's, I got into "end of the world" type stuff by watching Jack Van Impe, and eventually I found the web forum TB2k, then one by one, ATS, GLP, and FCN, which by 2010 was crowded with aging hippies. I learned about the theosophists like Blavatsky and Steiner, spiritualists, all the way to American psychics like Cayce, and modern ones such as Jordan Maxwell and David WIlcock. They all talked about vibrations and 12-strand DNA and indigo children, and everything, but they were especially interested in December 2012, which represented the end of time (something I had interest in from before) and when humanity would enter the age of aquarius, gain mental telepathy, and a golden age of perfect harmony would begin. Needless to say, once the time came and went, I, and assumedly many of them, were disappointed when none of that happened. It was the second huge disappointment of my life.