.
.
.
There are people in the replies suggesting that "we already knew this."
No, we didn't. And no, you didn't. Only a tiny number of people knew about this until now.
And, as we note in our story, "If the top-secret documents exist proving these charges, they are potentially proof that multiple US intelligence officials broke laws against spying and election interference."
This is a massive scoop that upends what people knew about the origins of the Russia collusion hoax.
In our piece, we describe how what has already been reported supports our new findings.
And more is coming soon...
>.
.
.
There are people in the replies suggesting that "we already knew this."
>No, we didn't. And no, you didn't. Only a tiny number of people knew about this until now.
>And, as we note in our story, "If the top-secret documents exist proving these charges, they are potentially proof that multiple US intelligence officials broke laws against spying and election interference."
>This is a massive scoop that upends what people knew about the origins of the Russia collusion hoax.
>In our piece, we describe how what has already been reported supports our new findings.
>And more is coming soon...
(post is archived)