>could undo most major federal laws No. Not it could not. The supreme court has zero authority over anything. It's a puppet show. >linking to a dead link like a retarded kike rather than archiving the submission like a Chad https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/10/29/supreme-court-just-took-case-epas-authority-its-decision-could-undo-most-major-federal-laws/ -> https://web.archive.org/web/20211030002501/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/10/29/supreme-court-just-took-case-epas-authority-its-decision-could-undo-most-major-federal-laws/ -> https://archive.md/s8Maz e; >But did it ever exist? Recent research shows, in fact, that the Supreme Court did not often use this doctrine before the 1930s — and that the Founders themselves often delegated authority to executive agencies, indicating they believed delegation was consistent with the Constitution. Retarded point to even bring up. There weren't very many federal agencies back then. To compare then to now is dishonest, it's a lie.

And just like that, it was gone. Should have archived it.