Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

240

This is a triggering subject so I have to qualify the question below everytime. Many who are sure we haven't get triggered if you have a different opinion. Interestingly, many who are sure we have get triggered if you have a different opinion. So, let's please not get triggered here and stick to logical arguments. Genius's on both sides of this argument have great points so let's try flushing them out a little. So, what I am about to tread down are serious questions which are intended as pure intellectual pursuit only. You don't have to participate if you don't want to.

Before replying, please refer to sub rule #2.

  1. Did the moon landing happen? Please elaborate with the following points.

  2. In what way(s) have you validated your understanding? I'm not talking about seeing video or reading something someone reported, but actually validated, such as experimented, seen with a telescope, etc.

  3. Is your understanding absolute? As in, for sure the moon landing happened. Or, for sure it didn't. What makes it absolute if this is the case? If it's not absolute, how do you break down your probabilities between the two?

  4. Over and above the first two points, is there anything that you believe is sketchy about NASA and space footage? For example, have you seen this (youtube.com) and if not what is your opinion after watching it?

This is a triggering subject so I have to qualify the question below everytime. Many who are sure we haven't get triggered if you have a different opinion. Interestingly, many who are sure we have get triggered if you have a different opinion. So, let's please not get triggered here and stick to logical arguments. Genius's on both sides of this argument have great points so let's try flushing them out a little. So, what I am about to tread down are serious questions which are intended as pure intellectual pursuit only. You don't have to participate if you don't want to. Before replying, please refer to sub rule #2. 1. Did the moon landing happen? Please elaborate with the following points. 2. In what way(s) have you validated your understanding? I'm not talking about seeing video or reading something someone reported, but actually validated, such as experimented, seen with a telescope, etc. 3. Is your understanding absolute? As in, for sure the moon landing happened. Or, for sure it didn't. What makes it absolute if this is the case? If it's not absolute, how do you break down your probabilities between the two? 4. Over and above the first two points, is there anything that you believe is sketchy about NASA and space footage? For example, have you seen [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuYydr7615Y) and if not what is your opinion after watching it?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (42).
[–] • 2 pts

There's also the serpent's tongue in the logo of every single space agency.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

That indeed is compelling, which is part of what makes this one hard to wrap your head around. For example, I have come across many videos, such as one's like this (youtube.com) or this (youtube.com).

The big issue why I don't conclude anything is because tt's circumstantial, and wondering about any validation.

For sure, it's not like they say given some real moments of video debunkings, but how do we know they didin't go to the moon in a different way than they showed? I always have trouble with video evidence because videos are totally fakeable. So, unrejected videos (that NASA shows which looks real) are also not really evidence for me.

As you and many are saying, some video evidence is totally fake. Not to be hyper pedantic, but consider if this video (youtube.com). It neither proves, or disproves that Bill Hader is a shapeshifter. I know he's not though, but it's the frustrating nature of "testimony" and "video evidence".

How can we validate? I mean this seriously, not to be pedantic or annoying.

[–] • 1 pt

Evidence of deception, absence of validation.

Ergo, quod apparet falsum…

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

This may be as good as we can get, unfortunately.

I'm going to try and view those reflectors in a telescope or something. I wonder what the chances are I can't find them? :)