Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

749

This is a triggering subject so I have to qualify the question below everytime. Many who are sure we haven't get triggered if you have a different opinion. Interestingly, many who are sure we have get triggered if you have a different opinion. So, let's please not get triggered here and stick to logical arguments. Genius's on both sides of this argument have great points so let's try flushing them out a little. So, what I am about to tread down are serious questions which are intended as pure intellectual pursuit only. You don't have to participate if you don't want to.

Before replying, please refer to sub rule #2.

  1. Did the moon landing happen? Please elaborate with the following points.

  2. In what way(s) have you validated your understanding? I'm not talking about seeing video or reading something someone reported, but actually validated, such as experimented, seen with a telescope, etc.

  3. Is your understanding absolute? As in, for sure the moon landing happened. Or, for sure it didn't. What makes it absolute if this is the case? If it's not absolute, how do you break down your probabilities between the two?

  4. Over and above the first two points, is there anything that you believe is sketchy about NASA and space footage? For example, have you seen this (youtube.com) and if not what is your opinion after watching it?

This is a triggering subject so I have to qualify the question below everytime. Many who are sure we haven't get triggered if you have a different opinion. Interestingly, many who are sure we have get triggered if you have a different opinion. So, let's please not get triggered here and stick to logical arguments. Genius's on both sides of this argument have great points so let's try flushing them out a little. So, what I am about to tread down are serious questions which are intended as pure intellectual pursuit only. You don't have to participate if you don't want to. Before replying, please refer to sub rule #2. 1. Did the moon landing happen? Please elaborate with the following points. 2. In what way(s) have you validated your understanding? I'm not talking about seeing video or reading something someone reported, but actually validated, such as experimented, seen with a telescope, etc. 3. Is your understanding absolute? As in, for sure the moon landing happened. Or, for sure it didn't. What makes it absolute if this is the case? If it's not absolute, how do you break down your probabilities between the two? 4. Over and above the first two points, is there anything that you believe is sketchy about NASA and space footage? For example, have you seen [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuYydr7615Y) and if not what is your opinion after watching it?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (42).
[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

According to your guidelines, none. No. and No.

I appreciate your honesty. What I gander is that you ride on "yes it happened" and "no I'm not sure of the evidence and haven't checked." I think I'm also there. Check out the video in point #4, I've found a bunch of others that raise some eyebrows.

Now prove it didn't happen

I'm not trying to prove or disprove anything. This is intended to be for serious participants. Honestly, what you'll find is that honing down questions and answering small snibbets, we can make sense of what is actually going on. I am certain there is some misinformation, but maybe we can logically suss out what fuckery is about. I honestly myself don't know either way, but have rejected a few pieces of footage and know there are some lies about.

If I can shut down flat earthers better once and for all, then that could be an a bonus of this thread.

If I can red-pill people that it didn't happen better, then that would a bonus of this thread.

I am not armed either way but would like to settle the debate here, or understand one way of the other better.

faggot

Please refer to sub rule #2: no faggotry. :)

[–] [deleted] • -1 pt

I'm not trying to prove or disprove anything.

then

If I can red-pill people that it didn't happen better, then that would a bonus of this thread.

Pretty disingenuous, but considering the content of this post.... what did I expect?

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Disingenuous? Please note that I made no claims either way and made BOTH statements:

If I can shut down flat earthers better once and for all, then that could be an a bonus of this thread.

This statement would be in the event flat earthers are wrong (i.e. the moon landing is real)

If I can red-pill people that it didn't happen better, then that would a bonus of this thread.

This statement would be in the event the moon landing didn't happen.

Not trying to trick anyone here at all. I'm trying to have a non-triggered debate and looking to have better evidence either way.

[–] [deleted] • -1 pt

lol. You might be able to bullshit some people with that, faggot. It's obvious what you believe and what you are trying to assert.

The burden of proof for those who claim it didn't happen is on them, but they have nothing except "mights" and "maybes." While those who assert that it did happen do have proof to fulfill the burden, but anytime proof is offered... apparently that's manufactured by every scientist and government official since the 60s. That includes the scientists and government officials from countries that would benefit from embarrassing the US by revealing that one of our greatest technological achievements has been a farce the entire time.