WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

519

This is a triggering subject so I have to qualify the question below everytime. Many who are sure we haven't get triggered if you have a different opinion. Interestingly, many who are sure we have get triggered if you have a different opinion. So, let's please not get triggered here and stick to logical arguments. Genius's on both sides of this argument have great points so let's try flushing them out a little. So, what I am about to tread down are serious questions which are intended as pure intellectual pursuit only. You don't have to participate if you don't want to.

Before replying, please refer to sub rule #2.

  1. Did the moon landing happen? Please elaborate with the following points.

  2. In what way(s) have you validated your understanding? I'm not talking about seeing video or reading something someone reported, but actually validated, such as experimented, seen with a telescope, etc.

  3. Is your understanding absolute? As in, for sure the moon landing happened. Or, for sure it didn't. What makes it absolute if this is the case? If it's not absolute, how do you break down your probabilities between the two?

  4. Over and above the first two points, is there anything that you believe is sketchy about NASA and space footage? For example, have you seen this (youtube.com) and if not what is your opinion after watching it?

This is a triggering subject so I have to qualify the question below everytime. Many who are sure we haven't get triggered if you have a different opinion. Interestingly, many who are sure we have get triggered if you have a different opinion. So, let's please not get triggered here and stick to logical arguments. Genius's on both sides of this argument have great points so let's try flushing them out a little. So, what I am about to tread down are serious questions which are intended as pure intellectual pursuit only. You don't have to participate if you don't want to. Before replying, please refer to sub rule #2. 1. Did the moon landing happen? Please elaborate with the following points. 2. In what way(s) have you validated your understanding? I'm not talking about seeing video or reading something someone reported, but actually validated, such as experimented, seen with a telescope, etc. 3. Is your understanding absolute? As in, for sure the moon landing happened. Or, for sure it didn't. What makes it absolute if this is the case? If it's not absolute, how do you break down your probabilities between the two? 4. Over and above the first two points, is there anything that you believe is sketchy about NASA and space footage? For example, have you seen [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuYydr7615Y) and if not what is your opinion after watching it?

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

I think they did as I saw the rocket take off. The control room was jam packed with people that had to do tons of shit manually, due to lame ass computers, that SpaceX could do on a smartphone today. That alone is circumstantial, but convincing. Also, a streetshitter mission sent back photos of the tracks of the moon lander that are still there. Don't except to see the planted flag to look like it did. With no UV filter the damn thing will be pure white by now. If done exactly the same way today, the same mission would cost almost 300 billion dollars.

I offer no proof as I've never been to the moon, that I can remember, just my acceptance of the evidence I've seen. There was absolutely no reason to fake the landing. None.

Also, did you by any chance watch that video in point 4 in the thread writeup above? I know it's conjecture, but curious of your thoughts.

a streetshitter mission sent back photos of the tracks of the moon lander that are still there.

Where is this. I'm very interested, as it would for sure be compelling evidence.

I offer no proof as I've never been to the moon, that I can remember, just my acceptance of the evidence I've seen.

It's hard to have proof. I appreciate what you said above regarding the "streetshitter" photos.

There was absolutely no reason to fake the landing. None.

Well ... have you read the protocols of zion? There is plenty reason to disorient science. From Protocol 9, paragraph 10:

WE HAVE FOOLED, BEMUSED AND CORRUPTED THE YOUTH OF THE "GOYIM" BY REARING THEM IN PRINCIPLES AND THEORIES WHICH ARE KNOWN TO US TO BE FALSE ALTHOUGH IT IS THAT THEY HAVE BEEN INCULCATED.

[–] [deleted] 1 pt (edited )

This is not definitive due to low resolution (phys.org). But, I accept it as I never doubted that the US spending billions to go the moon, with many lives lost along with way, wasn't successful.

I think, in this case, ZIonism is attempting to besmirch actual events in order to lessen the tremendous success of the US space program