Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

100

This is a triggering subject so I have to qualify the question below everytime. Many who are sure we haven't get triggered if you have a different opinion. Interestingly, many who are sure we have get triggered if you have a different opinion. So, let's please not get triggered here and stick to logical arguments. Genius's on both sides of this argument have great points so let's try flushing them out a little. So, what I am about to tread down are serious questions which are intended as pure intellectual pursuit only. You don't have to participate if you don't want to.

Before replying, please refer to sub rule #2.

  1. Did the moon landing happen? Please elaborate with the following points.

  2. In what way(s) have you validated your understanding? I'm not talking about seeing video or reading something someone reported, but actually validated, such as experimented, seen with a telescope, etc.

  3. Is your understanding absolute? As in, for sure the moon landing happened. Or, for sure it didn't. What makes it absolute if this is the case? If it's not absolute, how do you break down your probabilities between the two?

  4. Over and above the first two points, is there anything that you believe is sketchy about NASA and space footage? For example, have you seen this (youtube.com) and if not what is your opinion after watching it?

This is a triggering subject so I have to qualify the question below everytime. Many who are sure we haven't get triggered if you have a different opinion. Interestingly, many who are sure we have get triggered if you have a different opinion. So, let's please not get triggered here and stick to logical arguments. Genius's on both sides of this argument have great points so let's try flushing them out a little. So, what I am about to tread down are serious questions which are intended as pure intellectual pursuit only. You don't have to participate if you don't want to. Before replying, please refer to sub rule #2. 1. Did the moon landing happen? Please elaborate with the following points. 2. In what way(s) have you validated your understanding? I'm not talking about seeing video or reading something someone reported, but actually validated, such as experimented, seen with a telescope, etc. 3. Is your understanding absolute? As in, for sure the moon landing happened. Or, for sure it didn't. What makes it absolute if this is the case? If it's not absolute, how do you break down your probabilities between the two? 4. Over and above the first two points, is there anything that you believe is sketchy about NASA and space footage? For example, have you seen [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuYydr7615Y) and if not what is your opinion after watching it?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (42).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Disingenuous? Please note that I made no claims either way and made BOTH statements:

If I can shut down flat earthers better once and for all, then that could be an a bonus of this thread.

This statement would be in the event flat earthers are wrong (i.e. the moon landing is real)

If I can red-pill people that it didn't happen better, then that would a bonus of this thread.

This statement would be in the event the moon landing didn't happen.

Not trying to trick anyone here at all. I'm trying to have a non-triggered debate and looking to have better evidence either way.

[–] [deleted] • -1 pt

lol. You might be able to bullshit some people with that, faggot. It's obvious what you believe and what you are trying to assert.

The burden of proof for those who claim it didn't happen is on them, but they have nothing except "mights" and "maybes." While those who assert that it did happen do have proof to fulfill the burden, but anytime proof is offered... apparently that's manufactured by every scientist and government official since the 60s. That includes the scientists and government officials from countries that would benefit from embarrassing the US by revealing that one of our greatest technological achievements has been a farce the entire time.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

You haven't provided any arguments and are merely misrepresenting what is clearly typed. Further, you're acting triggered and trying to bring child like tantrums into the dialog, which is what faggots do.

No faggotry.